‘Norco Nails It with the Valence C2′

Review by Canadian Cyclist

In 2012 Norco introduced a new line of road bikes, called the Valence.  Consisting of 14 separate models – carbon and alloy, men’s and women’s – the Valence is Norco’s response to the growing demand for what is referred to as the ‘Endurance’ segment of the road market.  Specialized was one of the earliest brands to recognize it with their Roubaix line, but by now pretty much every manufacturer has at least a few models.

The Valence and others of its ilk are designed for the serious non-racer.  Whether they ride in organized events like GranFondos and long distance charity rides, or ride on their own, there has been an increasing recognition that bikes designed for racing are not necessarily the best for most types of riding.

Norco nailed it with the Valence C2

The 2013 Valence C2, 60 cm as tested
If you are not racing, you are likely willing to sacrifice some performance efficiency for comfort, especially on long rides.  A race bike may be the most efficient at transmitting power, but it is also more likely to beat you up on less than pristine surfaces and demand less comfortable aerodynamic positioning.  That doesn’t mean that you need to accept a bike that is a wet noodle, and won’t perform; just that there is a rational trade-off between performance and comfort.

We tested one of the carbon versions of the Valence, the C2 model, which sits squarely in the middle of the carbon range.  All five of the carbon models share the same geometry, plus there is one carbon Forma model, Forma being Norco’s women’s specific designation.  The top two models, the Di2 and C1, feature a higher quality (and slightly lighter) carbon matrix than the C2, C3 and C4 models.

If we compare the Valence to Norco’s race model, the Tactic, we can see visibly noticeable differences in the frame geometry.  The head tube on the Valence is half a degree slacker (for my 60 cm test bike), the seat tube a full degree less, the wheelbase is 13 mm longer and the head tube length is a significant 45 mm more.

photo

Read the full review at canadiancyclist.com

Pinkbike.com Reviews the Norco Range Killer B2

pinkbike

While there is still much debate among consumers as to just how far the 650B wheel craze is going to go, Norco left no one guessing about their thoughts on the ‘tweener wheel by offering six different 650B models for 2013, with the 160mm travel Range Killer B platform consisting of three of those models. Intended as a machine that can not only get you way out there during an all day epic, but also throw down when the time comes, the Range lineup features plenty of standover height, a removable splined ISCG-05 chain guide adapter, and meaty tires that give you a hint as to what the bike is capable of. The $3838 USD B-2 model tested here is spec’d with FOX’s air sprung Float CTD suspension, a 2×10 drivetrain, and Avid’s Elixir 5 brakes, making for a total weight of 31.6lb.

 
The curvy looking Range, with its black and blue colour matched components, instantly won over anyone who laid eyes on it in person, but there are a lot of details that require a closer look in order to spot. The hydroformed tubes change shape depending on what is needed of them, with large flares at the end of the top and down tubes where they come together at the tapered head tube, and a drastically sloping top tube that should make room for even the shortest of riders. Cable routing isn’t as sleek as we’ve seen on some other bikes, and there is no concession for internal routing, but Norco has built in guides for a dropper post along the seat tube and underside of the down tube. It seems many companies are moving to a removable (and replaceable) ISCG-05 adapter plate that fits onto splines around the bottom bracket shell, Norco included, and the bike’s X7 front derailleur is mounted directly to a stub protruding from the bike’s seat tube.

Like many other bikes, you’ll find clevis-style captured pivots at the end of the chain stays, but Norco is going about it a bit differently by actually machining the female end of the clevis section directly into the end of the tube rather than welding it on. This not only removes two welds from the bike, one on each side, but also goes a long way to ensuring perfect alignment.

Read the full review at pinkbike.com

MTBR’s Two Cents on the Range Killer B-3

Article from mtbr.com

A funny thing happened when I started riding the Norco Range Killer B. I forgot to analyze how the bike rode. I forgot to fixate on the differences between the 650b wheel size and how they rolled compared to other wheel sizes. I forgot to micro-parse obscure geometry details. Instead I enjoyed the unseasonable dryness of our local trails and just rode and rode and rode.

Eventually overcoming the feeling of contentment and satisfaction that comes with riding a bicycle that feels just right, I remembered that I had a job to do and started taking notes. Norco is a pretty conservative company; by that I mean they’re not known for bold moves. The Range was their bread and butter high-end pedally “North Shore” dual suspension bike; a 6-and-6 Horst-link machine that was well-received. But it’s not a bike that one would accuse of standing out from the crowd. Norco turned that reputation on its head last year when they announced that the Range (and Sight) line of bikes would go to the all-so-fashionable 650b wheel standard.

In the interests of breaking a trend of reviewing super-expensive specs, Norco made the relatively affordable $2,800 Range Three available for review. Having had a lot of time on Norco bike, I was prepared to enjoy it on the downhill. I wasn’t prepared to also love it on the uphill — but love it I did.

Bottom line, this bike was one of the best value-for-money bikes I have ever had the pleasure of riding. But beware. Demand for the Norco Range has been so great that the entire lineup of bikes is almost completely sold out. First world problems for Norco but a real world problem for consumers. Onward to the review.

pembertonDSC02123

Read the full review at mtbr.com

Bike Mag Exclusive – Norco Range Bible Review Video

bikemag

NORCO RANGE KILLER B-1 – BikeMag.com Exclusive
Price: $5,350
Weight: 30.7 pounds
Contact: norco.com

By Ryan LaBar

On paper, or at least the internet forums, the buzz surrounding the Range Killer B should be focused on its 650b wheels. On the trail, however, the new wheel size proves somewhat of a moot point, as the other changes Norco made to its 160-millimeter all-mountain bike overshadow the slight increase in wheel size.

This year’s Range receives a complete redesign, giving it a more refined tubeset, size-specific geometry and a reworked suspension linkage, or as Norco calls it, “Gravity Tuned.” The revamped suspension features a rearward axle-path in the beginning of its travel, allowing the Range to smash smoothly though fast, big, square-edged hits, providing a bit of stability when pushing through corners and G-outs, and adding a bit of anti-squat while pedaling at speed.

While this axle path helps the Norco eat up big hits and pedal well in the big ring, it bites back when climbing requires the granny ring. Every pedal stroke here causes the shock to extend to an almost distracting degree, and the bike to bounce. This could be a deal-breaker for riders who spend a lot of time climbing in the small chainring.

Adding to the Range’s descending and cornering capabilities, which earned unanimous praise, are a stiff frame front-to-back and an aggressive, slack geometry. One thing we noticed on the Range was that its big-ish wheels seemed to carry speed in a rather sneaky manner. It’s like driving a new car after owning an old beater, and suddenly noticing that you are doing 25 over. We found ourselves over-clearing jumps and rocketing through technical sections without extra effort or the perception of added speed—and everything about that is a good thing.

For this category, the parts hanging off the Range are nearly flawless—it featured a short stem, wide bars, Fox 34 fork, Avid X0 Trail brakes, SRAM drivetrain with a Type 2 rear derailleur, Schwalbe Hans Dampf tires and a chainguide with bashguard. This is one bike that we were happy to ride straight out of the box.

“I didn’t want to like a new wheelsize” Outside Converts to 650B on the Norco Range

Image (238) For all things outdoors the publication Outside is a top resource. If you are looking for gear, trips or stories this is a resource that can not be overlooked. This year’s Buyer’s Guide is bigger and better than ever plus it features the NOrco Range 2 as a top Mountain Bike Pick. Have a read below or better yet pick up a copy for yourself.

Norco Range Killer B2 – $3838 USD
Best For: Burly descents

The Test: We took the aluminum Range to the ledgy slickrock trails of Sedona, Arizona, and not only did it win over all comers to Norco bikes, it sold us on 650Bs. “I didn’t want to like a new wheel size,” groused one reviewer, “but it is hands-down better than either 26 or 29 for enduro-style riding.” Thanks to a slack 66.5-degree headtube and 6.3 seemingly bottomless inches of travel, it floated over stair-stepping drops and, on higher speed descents, flattened chunder like a sledge.

The Verdict: It’s a phenomenal deal, especially with a Fox Talas 34 fork and a Float DTC shock. 31lbs; norco.com
Climbing:4 Descending: 5

Image (237)

Download the PDF

Norco Tactic Reviewed in Bicycling

Image (227)Review from Bicycling Magazine

TO MOST CYCLISTS, NORCO IS PERHAPS BEST KNOWN for its North Shore-inspired mountain bikes, but the Canadian brand was, in fact, first established in 1964 to build road bikes. Today, models with skinny tires, including road and commuter bikes, make up about half of its line. The Tactic is the company’s latest high performance offering and its only race bike.

Norco’s previous road racer, the CRR, was a stiff model designed with input from the Continental Symmetric pro team that competed on it. But many modern road bikes are more than just unyielding rocketships like the CRR; these days, frames are also designed to smooth rough roads. Rather than update the older model, Norco decided to replace it with the Tactic-a model that addresses comfort in a way that the old frame did not, without giving up any speed. To add compliance in the places it’s most needed, the company’s  engineers borrowed the curved seatstays from Norco’s Valence endurance road bike and adapted them for this racier model. The result: stays that absorb some road chatter while still rapidly transferring power to the wheel the bike eagerly jumped ahead when I pedaled hard.
Norco didn’t only emphasize creating a comfortable ride-the Tactic 1is also lighter  than the CRR, and its chassis is stiffer. The company didn’t change the geometry.  Both models share the same sharp angles, including a short 17cm head tube (on our 58cm test bike). The low front end lets riders get into an aggressive position to help  them corner confidently and hide from the wind. Anyone who would like a more upright stance should consider the Valence or use an up-angled stem.

There are six versions of the Tactic, built around two frames. What sets each frame apart from the other is the type of carbon material used in its construction. This bike, the Tactic 1, has a frame that weighs 880 grams (claimed) and is built of a 46-ton carbon material. The lower-cost frame weighs 1,040 grams and is built of 24-ton carbon, a difference that should result in a slightly different feel on the road (we haven’t ridden the heavier version).

The Tactic’s frame has an airfoil-shaped seat tube and other designs intended to improve efficiency in a strong wind, an increasingly common trend on highend road bikes. Indeed, the company claims that the frame moves through the air more  efficiently than the older CRR. But the bike looks less slick than proven aero bikes like the Scott Foil, Cervelo S5, Specialized Venge, or BMC TimeMachine TMROl. We can’t say for sure, though. Norco used computer modeling to assess the bike’s aero  characteristics, but has not tested the Tactic in a wind tunnel. On the road, it was difficult to tell the difference between this bike and a non-aero road frame.

But the bike’s aerodynamic efficiency-or lack thereof-should not affect your enjoyment on the macadam. The Tactic does an admirable job of smoothing bumps while remaining responsive to input from the rider. It’s not the stiffest bike in its class, but it delivers a crisp, smooth ride that I never found jarring. Regardless of road surface, I could slice down descents without wavering. In fact, the Tactic reminded me of the widely lauded Cervelo R3-a well-balanced bike that is stable yet easy to maneuver in a pack or on  fast group rides.
This model is also a great value. The Tactic 1 that I tested comes with better than expected components for the price, including Shimano’s Ultegra drivetrain, Easton wheels, Fi’zi:k’s Arione Mg saddle, and cushy Clement Strada LGG 25mm tires. The parts are worthy of racing, but also appropriate for all-day recreational rides. In that respect, they are ideally suited to the Tactic-a fast, comfortable, mild-mannered bike that many different kinds of riders can enjoy -MattAllyn

Image (230) Image (231)

 

Download the PDF

NSMB’s First Take on the Dorado Equipped Aurum

2013 Norco Aurum 1 Dorado

Testing Norco’s Sleek DH Racer

Words by Morgan Taylor Photos by Morgan Taylor
March 25th, 2013

Norco did it right for the 2012 model year when they introduced a DH bike that both looked fast and went fast by modern standards. For 2013 the platform sees minor revisions and an updated spec range. Pricing structure has been updated, expanding the available models to five options from a previous three, with the Aurum 1 coming in either a Boxxer / DHX RC2 or Dorado / Double Barrel as seen on our test bike.

As soon as I jumped on the 2013 Norco Aurum 1 Dorado, the reason for this bike’s popularity was evident; generous top tubes and solid out-of-box spec make for confidence-inspiring gravity sled. Connor Macleod did a great job of covering the Aurum’s heritage in his initial overview last year and wrapped up its riding characteristics in the long term review – both with photos from Derek Dix. Using those articles as a backbone, this one can stay short and sweet.

Through the photo set below I will detail the Aurum’s changes for the 2013 model year and give my thoughts on a few months with the low slung racer. Click in to the first photo to enlarge and advance through using the arrow keys…

2013-Norco-Aurum-Dorado-1-10
The 2013 Norco Aurum 1 Dorado. The Aurum’s geometry numbers are as follows: 25″ top tube on the Large frame lines up with a lot of other companies’ XL size, but surprisingly the bike doesn’t feel too big. At 6 feet even, I am running the stem all the way forward in the 55mm setting with a 780mm bar. Low, slack, and fast like the graphics indicate. Riding photo by Jason Lucas.

Read more at nsmb.com

Norco’s Team 29er Online

First Remarks Review from 29eronline.com

Norco Bikes seems to quietly churn out bikes in British Columbia, with relatively little recognition by mainstream shops in the United States. I don’t quite get this, as they have a vast lineup of bikes at competitive prices that are excellent rides. If you don’t know much about NORCO bikes, read on, hopefully you will be interested enough to seek them out locally (also check out our previous review of the Revolver). If you know all about NORCO, and are interested in the NORCO Team 9.1 then you must be interested in going fast. The NORCO Team 9 series of bikes is about speed.

norco-Team-9.1-1

The Norco Team 9.1 ia a carbon fiber frame bike (hardtail) with a mid tier component group designed to allow a rider to be competitive at racing with an attainable price. Notice  “attainable”;  $3,370 dollars is far from inexpensive. However, if you are a competitive racer you, no doubt, know that racing bikes are expensive.  There are 4 bikes in the NORCO Team series. The LE at $5365, the 9.1(tested) at $3370, the 9.2 at $2320 and the 9.3 which uses a different grade of carbon dubbed mid-modulus at $1695. For a brief explanation of the difference in modulus Calfee Bikes has a nice explanation

We are approaching this bike as one of a series of bikes that will be tested as race bikes on a more down to earth budget. At the end of the day, we want to find out if you can be competitive racing this bike and if it holds up to the rigors of competitive racing. Not surprisingly then, we will be racing this bike. Zoe, Al, and Jamie will race this bike, among others, in consecutive races, trading between races. They will also train on the bike to see how it rides as a daily use bike.

About the bike. Norco Uses what they call “XC High-Modulus Carbon” and something they call Armorlite. Armorlite is the resin in their carbon fiber that helps with impact resistance, and contributes to claims of lighter and stronger bikes than the competition. We hope we don’t find out on issues related to impact resistance! No promises; as much as we don’t want to harm a bike we aren’t willing to hold back. If it is on an XC track in our local area, we will ride it.

Read the full review at 29eronline.com

A Vital Piece of the Puzzle – The Norco Range 2 Reviewed

“2013 Test Sessions: Norco Range Killer B-2”

Reviewed by Steve Wentz, Joe Schneider, and Brandon Turman // Photos by Shawn Spomer and Brandon Turman

For 2013, Norco has eliminated the 26-inch version of the Range in favor of a new 650B “Killer B” version. Yes, you read that right, another victim of the big wheel. They didn’t do it to spite the 26-inch lovers among us, though. The reasoning behind the switch, according to Norco, was simply in the pursuit of making the best all-mountain bike. In their eyes the way to do that just happened to be with the 650B wheel size, so they rolled with it. The end result is this beauty – a 160mm travel do-it-all shred sled. It comes in three price points, and we opted to give the mid-range Killer B-2 a go during our 2013 Test Sessions.

full_2013_Norco_Range_Killer_B_2

On The Trail

All told, the Range looks incredible out of the box, but how does it ride? Steve, Brandon, and Joe spent a good deal of time with it on four trails to find out. First, Joe and Brandon tested the merits of the larger wheels on the rocky Grafton Mesa Trail in Southern Utah, where most rocks resemble square-edged lunch boxes instead of round boulders. Later, Steve and Brandon rallied it on the moon-like terrain of Boulder City, Nevada.

With the seatpost up to full extension, the cockpit was roomy, comfortable, and familiar. The bars were a good width, the short stem length was appropriate for the bike’s purpose, and the top tube length felt just right. We’d say the bike erred on the side of comfort over efficiency. While the front end was definitely on the higher end of the spectrum, the length of the top tube eliminated the “circus bike” feeling. It just felt slightly taller than most up front.

Pointed downhill, the Range came alive. We felt instantly at home descending on the bike, and would even consider it for use on long, mellow downhill courses because we found it to be an incredibly capable descender. Once you got moving at a good pace, it became very playful, stable, and responsive to inputs, both side-to-side and jumping. At slow speeds the bike did have a slightly awkward, twitchy feel, but luckily getting up to speed and maintaining it was easy to do. Aided by the additional “trail” factor provided by the larger wheels, the 66.5-degree head angle seemed slacker than it was.

Despite the bike’s relatively short stays, the front end didn’t want to come up easily, likely due to the rearward axle path. This also made the bike feel a bit sluggish in really tight stuff. That said, the stability provided by the wheels, geometry, and suspension path more than made up for not being able to manual down the trail with ease. If there was a major downside to this bike when pointed downhill, it was that it tempted us into going too fast for what 160mm of travel could handle.

The rear suspension felt very, very good for a 160mm bike, and the Range excelled over small bumps, square-edged hits, chatter… just about everything. The action was extremely smooth, responsive, and confidence inspiring. Over loose terrain the suspension was supple, and combined with a slightly larger tire contact patch, traction over off-camber sections was great. Big hit performance was impressive as well thanks to the progressive nature of the A.R.T. rear end.

Read the full review at vitalmtb.com

Switchback Reviews the Sight Killer B

Article from Switchback Magazine

COVERNorco is located in the famed North Shore of British Columbia, and as a result specializes in big hit and freeride machines. This type of steep, technical riding has shaped the design of their bikes and even trickles down into their cross-country machines. Not only has the North Shore style of riding transcended categories within the Norco line, it now transcends wheel size with the launch of Norco’s 650B trail and all-mountain machines. 650B wheels are caught between 26- and 29-inch wheels, trying to capture the benefits of both without suffering any of the drawbacks. Norco has now entered the 650B game, but unlike other manufactures that have done little more than extend the chain stays, they have designed the entire frame to best take advantage of the medium-sized wheels. Another important point is that Norco has aimed their 650B-wheeled machines at the all-mountain and trail sectors instead of targeting cross-country hard tail riders. Taking up the 650B flag for Norco is the 160-mm travel Range and 140-mm Sight.

The new 650B Sight Killer B-2 slots into Norco’s line of trail bikes. Visually, the Sight Killer B-1 is descended from the 2012, 26-inch model, but has been completely redesigned around the larger wheel diameter. As Norco puts it, “Frame geometry and suspension kinematics are optimized to accentuate all of the positive characteristics that make the 650B perfect for all mountain riding.” The Sight Killer B-1 features Norco’s proprietary Gravity Tune sizing, which adjusts the rear-center / front-center ratio across frame sizes to allow a wide range of different sized riders to be placed in a balanced position on the bike. The Sight Killer B-1 also takes advantage of Norco’s A.R.T. four-bar suspension system to produce 140 mm of travel front and rear. One thing of note about the Sight Killer B-1 is that Norco designed the frame and rear suspension so that the 650B bike actually has a shorter chain stay length than the 26inch models from 2012. The 650B machine also provides increased stand over height compared to the 26-inch model it replaces.

Trail_NorcoTrail_Norco2

Download the PDF for the full article